NOTE: THE IMPACT OF A KNEE-JERK REACTION: THE PATRIOT ACT AMENDMENTS TO THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT AND THE ABILITY OF ONE WORD TO ERASE ESTABLISHED CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright (c) 2007 Hofstra Law Review Association
Hofstra Law Review

NOTE: THE IMPACT OF A KNEE-JERK REACTION: THE PATRIOT ACT AMENDMENTS TO THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT AND THE ABILITY OF ONE WORD TO ERASE ESTABLISHED CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Fall, 2007

36 Hofstra L. Rev. 185

Author

Joshua H. Pike*

Excerpt



I. Introduction
 
The attacks of September 11th sparked a new era in American political and legal history, altering the disposition of the nation's citizens and the legal community from a feeling of comfort and tranquility to vulnerability and paranoia. A result of this vulnerability was the knee-jerk reaction by the government to erect protective barriers to fortify the nation from external threats, and consequently permit surveillance techniques not previously validated by the judiciary, which threatened the individual privacy rights of American citizens. One legal response to the attacks was the amending of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ("FISA") by the U.S.A. Patriot Act to require "the significant purpose," rather than "the purpose," of warrantless surveillance to be foreign intelligence gathering. 1 This change in language had the stated purpose of deconstructing a Department of Justice ("DOJ") policy, created and imposed by the Department due to the misinterpretation of FISA by both the DOJ and the FISA court, which prevented communications between foreign intelligence agents engaged in FISA authorized surveillance and criminal prosecutors. 2 By amending the language of FISA to remedy an inter-departmental policy, the Patriot Act authorized surveillances of American citizens below the previously established constitutional limits.

This Note argues that the history of warrantless surveillance and judicial interpretation of FISA did not require the restriction of communications, referred to as the "wall," between foreign intelligence and law enforcement agents and that in its current form, the Patriot Act exceeds the judicially established constitutional limitations ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities