Colloquy Essay: WHAT TOOL WORKS TELLS US ABOUT TAILORING PATENT MISUSE REMEDIES+ Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright (c) 2008 Northwestern University School of Law
Northwestern University Law Review

Colloquy Essay: WHAT TOOL WORKS TELLS US ABOUT TAILORING PATENT MISUSE REMEDIES+

+ This Essay was previously published in the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy on May 21, 2007, as David McGowan, What Tool Works Tells Us About Tailoring Patent Misuse Remedies, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 208 (2007), http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/colloquy/2007/16/.

Winter, 2008

102 Nw. U.L. Rev. 421

Author

David McGowan*

Excerpt



No one was surprised when, in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 1 the Supreme Court reversed the rule that a patentee accused of tying in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act is presumed to have economic power in the product market to which the patent pertains. 2 That presumption was contrary to both logic and experience.

The Court's reasoning is interesting, however, because it points the way to tailoring remedies for patent misuse. The default remedy for misuse is that courts refuse to enforce the patent against any defendant, not just against the victim of misuse. 3 Tool Works drew on section 271(d)(5) of the Patent Act 4 to reform an antitrust liability rule not mentioned in the statute but influenced by the policy choices it reflects. Similarly, though section 271(d)(5) does not mention misuse remedies, the policy choices it reflects undermine the rationale for the default remedy for patent misuse.

I.
 
Patent misuse is an affirmative defense to an infringement action. A patentee misuses a patent when the patentee takes some action to broaden the scope of patent rights or lengthen their duration. 5 Misuse allegations are typically aimed at license terms. 6 Most misuse cases involve tying claims, in which an infringement defendant argues that a patentee unlawfully tied the purchase of unpatented goods to the purchase or license of patented ones. 7

Tool Works involved a contract term requiring licensees of Tool Works' patented inkjet heads and ink ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities