ARTICLE: The Changing Scope of Human Rights in the Context of Counter-Terrorism in Singapore: A comparative Perspective Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your® ID to access the full text of this article.
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a® ID.
US $22.00 (+ tax)

Copyright (c) 2011 O. P. Jindal Global University, All Rights Reserved.
Jindal Global Law Review

ARTICLE: The Changing Scope of Human Rights in the Context of Counter-Terrorism in Singapore: A comparative Perspective

March, 2011

Jindal Global Law Review

2 Jindal Global L. Rev. 157


Sarah Shi + and Ronald Wong *



Terrorism, the watchword of the past decade, is arguably here to stay, with the precarious equilibrium further endangered by the increasing availability of nuclear capabilities. Inevitably, many states have responded to the problem with heightened counter-terrorism measures, which invariably impinge on human rights, leading to observations that the scope of protection afforded to human rights in the "age of terror" is increasingly shrinking. The intersection of national security and human rights has long been one of the most troubling areas of law, the key underlying tension being that between individual liberty and collective security. 1 The state's struggle against terrorism must be conducted inside the law. 2 The rules to be complied with are based on balancing; they are not "all or nothing" -- in this balancing, human rights cannot receive their full protection as if there was no terrorism, likewise state security cannot receive its full protection as if there were no human rights. 3

Most states have implemented a counter-terrorism framework, and such frameworks must be constantly reworked to meet or pre-empt new threats. This article explores how Singapore, the United States and the United Kingdom have implemented counter-terrorism measures. The focus of the article is on Singapore, with the latter two jurisdictions being chosen for a comparative analysis, since they are often perceived as the most vocal advocates of human rights. 4 The Singapore government has been said to eschew 'rights' discourse in favour of a 'responsibilities' discourse, 5 consistently maintaining ...
If you are interested in obtaining a® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at
Search Documents
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities