Copyright (c) 2012 Yeshiva University
Cardozo Law Review
ARTICLE: A Short History of "Intellectual Property" in Relation to Copyright
Cardozo Law Review
33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1293
In the corridors of law firms, industry, or government it would not be controversial to say copyright is intellectual property. But you are now in the pages of a law journal, and on the printed academic page almost anything can be the subject of healthy contest. Of course, the proposition that copyright is intellectual property is too behaviorally true - that's what people say - for a direct assault, but a wide variety of commentators have expressed concerns about calling the exclusive rights of copyright (or patents) a form of "property." As part of this critique, some commentators have claimed that "intellectual property" is a relatively new concept, implying that this unpedigreed concept has itself aided the strengthening of the laws that fall under it.
Elsewhere I have provided two responses to these claims. First, there is no question that "intellectual property" was a moniker used much earlier and more frequently than these commentators have acknowledged. Second, regardless of the use of "intellectual property," copyright was always called "literary property." So if the concern is the persuasive power of "property," it does not matter whether copyright was viewed as "literary property" or "intellectual property." 1 The only way "intellectual property" would make a difference would be if the development of this umbrella concept for patent, copyright, trademark, and design protection somehow strengthened one or more of those laws. That is certainly possible, and ...
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.