SYMPOSIUM: DAUBERT, INNOCENCE, AND THE FUTURE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE: MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF THE DAUBERT TRILOGY: REFINING AND REDEFINING THE RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright (c) 2007 The University of Tulsa
Tulsa Law Review

SYMPOSIUM: DAUBERT, INNOCENCE, AND THE FUTURE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE: MEETING THE CHALLENGES OF THE DAUBERT TRILOGY: REFINING AND REDEFINING THE RELIABILITY OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE

Winter, 2007

The University of Tulsa Law Review

43 Tulsa L. Rev. 417

Author

Mara L. Merlino,* Victoria Springer,** Jan Seaman Kelly,*** Derek Hammond,**** Eric Sahota,***** and Lori Haines******

Excerpt



I. Introduction
 
Daubert 1 and its progeny, General Electric Co. v. Joiner 2 and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 3 established new guidelines and procedures for determining the evidentiary reliability of expert testimony. Following the Daubert trilogy, the admissibility of expert testimony is presumably based not only on an analysis of the evidence's legal merits and Frye's general acceptance standard, 4 but also on the judicial analysis of the qualifications of the expert, the methods by which the expert arrives at his or her conclusions, and even the conclusions themselves. 5

Judges' interpretations of their gatekeeping responsibilities under the Daubert trilogy have imposed more objective, stringent requirements (relevancy, legal sufficiency, and reliability) for the admissibility of some kinds of evidence which for seventy years had been considered admissible under the Frye decision's general acceptance standard, while other kinds of evidence have remained relatively unaffected by the Daubert trilogy. 6 Confronted with challenges to the admissibility of evidence from their various fields, forensic practitioners have responded to the questions about the reliability of their testimony by seeking ways to both improve their disciplines and demonstrate to judges, attorneys, academicians, and fellow experts that their underlying assumptions, methods, and conclusions meet the requirements of the Daubert trilogy.

This discourse among practitioners, judges, attorneys, law professors, and evidence scholars about how the admissibility of expert testimony from the forensic fields should be determined illustrates an issue relevant to all expert testimony. Gary Edmond wrote


 
because the various sciences maintain different ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities