ARTICLE: Controlling Campaign Spending and the "New Corruption": Waiting for the Court. Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your® ID to access the full text of this article.
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a® ID.
US $22.00 (+ tax)

Copyright Vanderbilt University 1991.

Vanderbilt Law Review

ARTICLE: Controlling Campaign Spending and the "New Corruption": Waiting for the Court.

May, 1991

New York University Law Review

44 Vand. L. Rev. 767


Gerald G. Ashdown *



This statement by the United States Supreme Court appears to present its position on campaign finance restrictions. It must be viewed, however, in juxtaposition to other often quoted language of the Court

concluding that restricting the speech of one in an effort to enhance that of another is contrary to the first amendment. 2 These conclusions led the Court to the dichotomous holding in Buckley v. Valeo 3 that campaign contribution restrictions contained in the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) 4 constitutionally were permissable, but that similar limitations on independent expenditures violated first amendment free speech guarantees. The Court in Buckley defined corruption as the improper exchange of large contributions for commitments from the candidate. 5 The Court concluded that corruption was a sufficient governmental concern and validated the contribution restrictions in FECA. 6 It also found, however, that independent expenditures did not pose a similar risk of corruption. 7 The Court's refusal even to consider a possible governmental interest in equalizing the relative influence of speakers on elections constitutionally left sacrosanct independent expenditures.

Unfortunately, Buckley and its progeny have left campaign finance even more troubled than it was prior to attempts at legislative reform. 8 It is now more difficult for nonwealthy candidates to raise money; simultaneously, massive spending by wealthy candidates and organizations goes uncontrolled. 9 Unregulated expenditures not only have increased the cost of running for office, but also have fueled the political action committee (PAC) phenomenon. 10 Limits on the amount ...
If you are interested in obtaining a® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at
Search Documents
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities