SPECIAL PROJECT: Buying Fertility: The Constitutionality of Welfare Bonuses for Welfare Mothers Who Submit to Norplant Insertion. Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright Vanderbilt University 1993.

Vanderbilt Law Review

SPECIAL PROJECT: Buying Fertility: The Constitutionality of Welfare Bonuses for Welfare Mothers Who Submit to Norplant Insertion.

APRIL, 1993

46 Vand. L. Rev. 715

Author

John Robert Hand *

Excerpt

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1990, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories introduced Norplant, a five-year contraceptive consisting of six capsules that release contraceptive hormones when inserted in a woman's arm. 1 Soon after the introduction of Norplant, a Philadelphia Inquirer editorial column stirred tremendous controversy when the author suggested that Norplant could solve the welfare problem if states would offer welfare mothers incentives to use the device. 2 Tremendous outrage and cries of racism, fascism and genocide prompted the Inquirer's Editor, Maxwell King, to apologize publicly and retract the editorial. 3

Despite the fury, some states have introduced welfare reform bills that would do exactly what the Inquirer editorial so boldly suggested. 4 In a nutshell, the typical law would offer female welfare recipients a cash incentive of $ 500 if they allow the state to insert Norplant at its own expense. If passed, such a law would not only generate a wave of criticism but also would present a most perplexing constitutional antimony. Essentially, a law offering cash for Norplant insertion would bring two unresolved and arguably unsolvable constitutional doctrines -- the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions and the doctrine of certain "privacy rights" as fundamental constitutional rights -- to bear on the same issue.

The unconstitutional conditions doctrine states that the government cannot bribe people with benefits and privileges to forego rights with which the government could not interfere directly. For example, the government could not pay people $ 100 a week not to go to church or pay them to worship ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities