ARTICLE: WHY LAWYERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ADVERTISE: A MARKET ANALYSIS OF LEGAL SERVICES. Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright 1983 New York University Law Review.

New York University Law Review

ARTICLE: WHY LAWYERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ADVERTISE: A MARKET ANALYSIS OF LEGAL SERVICES.

NOVEMBER, 1983

58 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1084

Author

GEOFFREY C. HAZARD, JR. * and RUSSELL G. PEARCE ** and JEFFREY W. STEMPEL ***

Excerpt

INTRODUCTION

In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 1 a 1977 decision, the United States Supreme Court overturned the American Bar Association's (ABA) sixty-nine-year-old prohibition of advertising by lawyers. 2 The Bates holding invalidated comprehensive bans on lawyer advertising but left unsettled the scope of permissible regulation. While the Bates Court found attorneys' price advertising to be protected speech under the first amendment, 3 it also stated that false and misleading advertising could be prohibited. 4 The majority expressly declined to consider the problems of advertising claims relating to the quality of legal services. 5

The organized bar's reaction to Bates has been hesitant and inconsistent. Two years after the decision, fifteen states still had not formulated new advertising standards. 6 Although by the middle of 1982 bar associations in all states and in the District of Columbia had adopted rules allowing some promotional activities by lawyers, 7 many of these new rules permit only print advertising of the name, address, and specialization of an attorney, 8 and thus may be incompatible with the potentially broader scope of the Bates holding. 9 In response to Bates, the ABA revised the Model Code of Professional Responsibility to permit limited advertising of the type specifically at issue in the case: simple publication by print or radio. It concurrently rejected a proposal that would have allowed all advertising that was not "false, fraudulent, and misleading." 10 Subsequently, the ABA Commission on the Evaluation of Professional Standards, 11 which was charged with ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities