RECENT DECISIONS: CIVIL RIGHTS - Title VII Protection For Centerfold - Burns v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 955 F.2d 559 (8th Cir.), on remand to 807 F. Supp. 506 (N.D. Iowa 1992), rev'd, 989 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1993). Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright (c) 1993 Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Temple Law Review

RECENT DECISIONS: CIVIL RIGHTS - Title VII Protection For Centerfold - Burns v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 955 F.2d 559 (8th Cir.), on remand to 807 F. Supp. 506 (N.D. Iowa 1992), rev'd, 989 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1993).

Fall, 1993

66 Temp. L. Rev. 1039

Author

Caroline M. Kurz

Excerpt





Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of an "individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin." 1 Prior to 1976, courts refused to recognize sexual harassment as sex discrimination under Title VII. 2 In 1980, however, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") promulgated guidelines that specifically stated that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII. 3 Since 1980, the United States Supreme Court and lower federal courts have consistently referred to the EEOC guidelines in recognizing sexual harassment as sex discrimination under Title VII. 4

In 1986, the United States Supreme Court first addressed the issue of workplace sexual harassment in Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson. 5 The Meritor Court unanimously held that sexual harassment that creates a "hostile environment" constitutes illegal sex discrimination under Title VII. 6 The Court restricted actionable hostile work environment claims to harassment that is so severe and pervasive that it alters the conditions of employment and creates a hostile and abusive work environment. 7 The Court, however, failed to provide the lower federal courts with standards to assess whether the alleged sexual harassment is so severe and pervasive as to create a hostile work environment under Title VII. 8

Because the Supreme Court provided little guidance, the lower federal courts developed several different tests to evaluate hostile work environment claims of sexual harassment. The first approach involves a two-pronged test: an objective test based on the ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities