CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Pennsylvania's Wrongful Birth Statute's Impact on Abortion Rights: State Action and Undue Burden - Edmonds v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital Radiology Assocs., 607 A.2d 1083 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). Skip over navigation
LexisNexis® Browse Law Reviews and Treatises
Skip over navigation
Sign in with your lexis.com® ID to access the full text of this article.
-OR-
Order the full text of this article if you do not have a lexis.com® ID.
 
Price: 
US $22.00 (+ tax)
 
 

Copyright (c) 1993 Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Temple Law Review

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Pennsylvania's Wrongful Birth Statute's Impact on Abortion Rights: State Action and Undue Burden - Edmonds v. Western Pennsylvania Hospital Radiology Assocs., 607 A.2d 1083 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992).

Fall, 1993

66 Temp. L. Rev. 1087

Author

Adam M. Silverman

Excerpt



"Liberty finds no refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt." 1 So begins the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 2 the Court's most recent attempt to put to rest the controversy surrounding state efforts to regulate abortion. In the two decades since the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Roe v. Wade, 3 many states have worked directly and indirectly to regulate abortion. State efforts to restrict abortion rights have taken a variety of forms. Some measures seek to control access to abortion through state imposed requirements such as mandatory waiting periods, spousal notification requirements, and fiscal controls forbidding the use of state funds for abortion services or counseling. 4 State laws that do not directly regulate access to abortion may still affect a woman's ability to choose abortion or to obtain abortion services. Pennsylvania's wrongful birth statute represents one example of this kind of indirect state abortion regulation.

Title 42, section 8305(a) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated eliminates a previously recognized common law cause of action for wrongful birth. 5 The wrongful birth cause of action had been available to parents claiming that but for the act or omission of the defendant, the mother would have aborted her pregnancy. 6 By eliminating wrongful birth claims, section 8305(a) allows medical care providers negligently or intentionally to misrepresent information to a pregnant woman regarding the health and status of her fetus without fear of tort liability. 7 Such misinformation ...
 
 
If you are interested in obtaining a lexis.com® ID and Password, please contact us at 1-(800)-227-4908 or visit us at http://www.lexisnexis.com/.
Search Documents
 
eg., Environmental Insurance Coverage Under the Comprehensive General Liability Policy
 
 
 
 

Lexis® Web - The only search engine that delivers free web content specifically from legal sites validated by LexisNexis® attorney editors and includes tools for faster research and more relevant results.

 
LexisNexis Store
Research Now - Go to lexis.com
Connect the Dots - Free 1 hour webcast
Share. Network. Discover. - Go to LexisNexis Communities